Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Bush's Bunker Mentality


I recently saw the German film The Downfall, which portrays the final days of Hitler and his entourage in the underground bunker in Berlin. Critical reception of the movie has been mixed, and I myself was left a little cold by it. Perhaps it was too faithful in portraying the "banality of evil," although I would not have wanted to be entertained by a ginned-up, bathetic version of the story. That would merely be grotesque. Whatever the shortcomings of the film, it has struck a chord with me regarding the insularity and irrationality of political leaders who feel empowered by a messianic purpose, and those who allow such leaders to lead us all into destruction and death. Roger Ebert came away from the film with this warning:
What I also felt, however, was the reality of the Nazi sickness, which has been distanced and diluted by so many movies with so many Nazi villains that it has become more like a plot device than a reality. As we regard this broken and pathetic Hitler, we realize that he did not alone create the Third Reich, but was the focus for a spontaneous uprising by many of the German people, fueled by racism, xenophobia, grandiosity and fear. He was skilled in the ways he exploited that feeling, and surrounded himself by gifted strategists and propagandists, but he was not a great man, simply one armed by fate to unleash unimaginable evil. It is useful to reflect that racism, xenophobia, grandiosity and fear are still with us, and the defeat of one of their manifestations does not inoculate us against others.

It would be misguided indeed - not to mention intellectually lazy - to compare George W. Bush with Adolf Hitler. But it is equally mistaken to believe in Nazi exceptionalism - that strains of the "Nazi sickness" do not continue to plague us today. I had that in my mind as I read today Seymour Hersh's latest reporting in the New Yorker on Iraq and the Bush's leadership of the war. (Something tells me Arianna will never call Hersh just another dumb blonde, as she did Wooward. Sy Hersh is the real deal, it would appear. Call him the T-Rex of journalists, however - I fear his species is extinct.)

I'm excerpting his article at some length here. It's too important to miss. I think because we have lived with a version of this reality for so long now, it's become nearly normalized. We're not really engaging with the staggering implications. We have allowed ourselves to become distracted, inoculated, appeased, indifferent, and blase - as if were believed present course were merely a pendulum swing to the right. This too shall pass. In other words, if our democracy was truly being threatened by fascistic leadership, we wouldn't really notice.

UP IN THE AIR
Where is the Iraq war headed next?
by SEYMOUR M. HERSHNew Yorker Issue of 2005-12-05
Posted 2005-11-28

[...]"Current and former military and intelligence officials have told me that the President remains convinced that it is his personal mission to bring democracy to Iraq, and that he is impervious to political pressure, even from fellow Republicans. They also say that he disparages any information that conflicts with his view of how the war is proceeding.

Bush's closest advisers have long been aware of the religious nature of his policy commitments. In recent interviews, one former senior official, who served in Bush's first term, spoke extensively about the connection between the President's religious faith and his view of the war in Iraq. After the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the former official said, he was told that Bush felt that "God put me here" to deal with the war on terror. The President's belief was fortified by the Republican sweep in the 2002 congressional elections; Bush saw the victory as a purposeful message from God that "he's the man," the former official said. Publicly, Bush depicted his re-election as a referendum on the war; privately, he spoke of it as another manifestation of divine purpose.

The former senior official said that after the election he made a lengthy inspection visit to Iraq and reported his findings to Bush in the White House: "I said to the President, 'We're not winning the war.' And he asked, 'Are we losing?' I said, 'Not yet.'" The President, he said, "appeared displeased" with that answer. "I tried to tell him," the former senior official said. "And he couldn't hear it."

[...]

Many of the military's most senior generals are deeply frustrated, but they say nothing in public, because they don't want to jeopardize their careers. The Administration has "so terrified the generals that they know they won't go public," a former defense official said. A retired senior C.I.A. officer with knowledge of Iraq told me that one of his colleagues recently participated in a congressional tour there. The legislators were repeatedly told, in meetings with enlisted men, junior officers, and generals that "things were fucked up." But in a subsequent teleconference with Rumsfeld, he said, the generals kept those criticisms to themselves.

One person with whom the Pentagon's top commanders have shared their private views for decades is Representative John Murtha, of Pennsylvania, the senior Democrat on the House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee. The President and his key aides were enraged when, on November 17th, Murtha gave a speech in the House calling for a withdrawal of troops within six months. The speech was filled with devastating information. For example, Murtha reported that the number of attacks in Iraq has increased from a hundred and fifty a week to more than seven hundred a week in the past year. He said that an estimated fifty thousand American soldiers will suffer "from what I call battle fatigue" in the war, and he said that the Americans were seen as "the common enemy" in Iraq. He also took issue with one of the White House's claims - that foreign fighters were playing the major role in the insurgency. Murtha said that American soldiers "haven't captured any in this latest activity" - the continuing battle in western Anbar province, near the border with Syria. "So this idea that they're coming in from outside, we still think there's only seven per cent."

Murtha's call for a speedy American pullout only seemed to strengthen the White House's resolve. Administration officials "are beyond angry at him, because he is a serious threat to their policy - both on substance and politically," the former defense official said. Speaking at the Osan Air Force base, in South Korea, two days after Murtha's speech, Bush said, "The terrorists regard Iraq as the central front in their war against humanity. . . . If they're not stopped, the terrorists will be able to advance their agenda to develop weapons of mass destruction, to destroy Israel, to intimidate Europe, and to break our will and blackmail our government into isolation. I'm going to make you this commitment: this is not going to happen on my watch."

"The President is more determined than ever to stay the course," the former defense official said. "He doesn't feel any pain. Bush is a believer in the adage 'People may suffer and die, but the Church advances.'" He said that the President had become more detached, leaving more issues to Karl Rove and Vice-President Cheney. "They keep him in the gray world of religious idealism, where he wants to be anyway," the former defense official said. Bush's public appearances, for example, are generally scheduled in front of friendly audiences, most often at military bases. Four decades ago, President Lyndon Johnson, who was also confronted with an increasingly unpopular war, was limited to similar public forums. "Johnson knew he was a prisoner in the White House," the former official said, "but Bush has no idea."

Friday, November 18, 2005

Mia, Guest Blogger



Mia: Are we going to write something on the blog today?
Mom: Sure. Do you have anything you want to say?
Mia: mmmmmmm...
Mom: How about when we met the sea lion at the Aquarium last weekend?
Mia mmmmmm...
Mia: I know!
Mary: OK! Tell me. It could be anything.
Mia: I'm not going to tell you now. I'm going to wait until you're asleep. Then I'm going to whisper it in your ear, and then you'll dream about it. And then in the morning you'll know what to say.
Mary: [IloveyouIloveyouIloveyou]
Mary: That's a great idea!

Thursday, November 17, 2005

The Fourth Estate now a Gated Community

I recently asked why the mainstream media hasn't been more aggressive in exploring the apparent power struggle between the CIA's Counterproliferation Division (in which Valeria Plame was an operative) and Dick Cheney (whose former company, Halliburton, was doing business with an Iranian nuclear energy negotiator and diplomatic specialist.). I wondered, where is my generation's Bernstein and Woodward to expose the admininstrations's lies and stratagems?

Turns out, the actual Woodward is now so embedded with Cheney he hasn't changed the sheets since the first inaugural, and Bernstein is making clucking-hen type excuses for him.

Washing ton Post, November 17, 2005; 1:45 AM:


Bob Woodward apologized to The Washington Post yesterday for failing to reveal for more than two years that a senior Bush administration official had told him about CIA operative Valerie Plame, even as an investigation of who disclosed her identity mushroomed into a national scandal.

"I apologized because I should have told him about this much sooner," Woodward, who testified in the CIA leak investigation Monday, said in an interview. "I explained in detail that I was trying to protect my sources. That's job number one in a case like this. . . . "I hunkered down. I'm in the habit of keeping secrets. I didn't want anything out there that was going to get me subpoenaed."

Editor and Publisher, November 16:

Watergate legend Carl Bernstein warned critics to back off heir attacks on his former partner Bob Woodward following this week’s disclosures that Woodward had testified in the Valerie Plame case, and had failed to inform Washington Post editors for two years about a confidential
conversation he’d had with a White House official. “I think there is an awful lot of piling on,” Bernstein told E&P. “It’s outrageous to question Bob’s integrity as some seem to be doing. Anyone who looks at the record knows that it is the most distinguished journalistic record of our time.”

In Memoriam

Priscilla, 1991-2005.
Rest easy, my sweet kitty.

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

Arianna & Ahmad: The Movie


Here's a movie pitch I would love to make. Heck, it's a movie I would love to actually make!

Arianna Huffington grills Ahmad Chalabi on WMD over the remnants of sushi dinner. Think My Dinner with Andre meets IFC's Dinner for Five meets His Girl Friday.

If you don't think that would make for compelling cinema, just read Arianna's account at the Huffington Post. I love this:
"There is no way [Chalabi] is going to get Rumsfeld and Cheney, steeped in the neocon "you're either at the table or on the menu" ethos, to agree to limit the powers of the U.S. army."

[note to self: Netflix My Dinner with Andre again. Impossible to watch too many times]

Sunday, November 13, 2005

Amber Davis Tourlentes: Queering the Family Portrait


I'd like to introduce you to Amber Davis Tourlentes, an artist whose work I admire incredibly. Her smart, warm, and humorous photography plays with representations of changing family and social relations in the very traditional domain of family portraiture.

I'll let her artist's statement speak for itself:

"Through photography and representation I investigate the possibilities for contemporary families to construct gender, sexual and class identities beyond the postindustrial traditions of the nuclear family. For eight years I have placed my gay and straight-parented homes at the center of my inquiries into the familial gaze and modern representation of family in visual culture.

My parents are the product of the post 1960s sexual, feminist and gay movements and the 80’s AIDS epidemic - a web of cultural vantage points that have informed personal and political notions of sexual identity, family and community. This multiplicity of subjective locations informs my process of research and image-making. My work challenges the portraiture and documentary cannon and family photographic practices and traditions with a visual critique drawn from contested theories of gender, identity and class.
Six years ago I began photographing families parented by gay men who had been a part of Boston's South End community when I was being raised there by my gay father. Many of these couples have moved to suburban Boston communities, where they are now raising children. In the past five years this project has extended to include lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered-parented families, and a growing national community of adult children of gay parents. The photographs are made in the intimate space of homes, and during public LGBT gatherings at traditionally safe gay vacation destinations all over the country. These events are organized by parents and coalitions that represent the LGBT community.

These Coalitions I work with and photograph include FamilyPride, GLAD, HRC, Families Like Mine and COLAGE. The coalitions serve the LGBT community with educational programming, family networking and social services, fundraising for lobby work and legal process, and building alliances with private and corporate funders.

My interest in the photographic representation of gay family culture began specifically with same-sex parents raising children. The photographic project has extended to a curiosity about the reworking of not only gender but also ethnic, religious and class roles for family and community members. Unexpectedly, so far in this body of work, economic conditions such as class, more so than gender, have emerged as a defining family social structure. The representations of class in my work also reflects the increasingly commercialized space of LGBT family events. As LGBT families have become more visible, they have increasingly become the focus of targeted marketing as consumers. I'm interested in exploring how the burgeoning corporate sponsorship of LGBT community events influences and synergistically generates media images of certain kinds of gay families."

Friday, November 11, 2005

In Search of the Intelligent Designer

Best blog of the day: Was the Universe "Intelligently Designed" ... by Satan?

Check out the comments for the great rebuttal: we all know the universe was created by the Flying Spaghetti Monster. I feel like going to church today! Have any of you been touched by his noodly appendage?

Thursday, November 10, 2005

Libera Elects the First Woman President in Africa: Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf


Just in from the BBC: Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, known as the "Iron Lady", has claimed victory as the first woman to be elected president in Liberia, and Africa as a whole.


Read about this extraordinary woman's life at Women Waging Peace and at her campaign site.

Ellen on National Unity:
One of the reasons that Liberia is currently in turmoil is that we have permitted our differences, both ethnic and political, to divide us.


We believe that democracy and diversity are compatible. We believe that we do not have to be the same to co-exist. I believe that we can have differences of opinion without resorting to violence.


We will strive to respect and accept our history and I will promote a social and a political environment that unites all Liberians under the principle of “One People One Destiny.”


We will preach and practice national reconciliation and I will ensure that my government is one of inclusion, which reflects the diversity of the nation and grants equal rights and equal security to all.
Our goal is to lay a foundation for a new, strong and productive Liberia in which:



  • The government reflects the social religious and cultural diversity of our nation.

  • Every Liberian has a recognized role to play in national development.

  • Opportunities are made available to everybody who is prepared to work.

  • An extra effort is made to rehabilitate those who have lost hope and trust in their government and country, particularly our youth and ex-combatants, so long as they are truly committed to peace and development.

  • Those who have been internally and externally displaced from their communities are reintegrated into society.

  • There is an assurance for all Liberians within our borders of equal justice and protection under our laws.


To this end, we believe Liberia needs a successful program of disarmament, demobilization, reintegration and resettlement which will enable our children who had been forced into arms and who have been robbed of their childhood and youth, to return to the schools and training programs that will make them productive, constructive citizens. The same applies to the thousands of Liberians who have been made refugees and internally displaced.We believe that, together, we can make these things happen and that the future of Liberia depends upon our ability to work diligently toward these goals.

Bad Girls Recap: 1.1 "Them and Us"

Who knew this recap thing was so hard? Warning: this thing turned into a real monster! There's too much dialogue, perhaps, but that's one of the most enjoyable elements of the show for me - the extremely vivid language.

For great taste of the episode visually, check out the Photo Love Story (icky name, good snark).

The season opens with a bang – women in flashy, trashy costumes sashaying in a “Staying Alive” dance number, like a bad karaoke night in a drag bar in Provincetown. The scene is anxiety provoking, interrupted by short cuts of a woman screaming in pain – apparently for some other reason than the dangerously camp disco. The lights go up on the dance show, and we se that we are in Larkhall women’s prison, at a rehearsal for a “fashion show.” In the short opening scene we are skillfully introduced to nearly all of the major characters, save one. The editing and acting somehow manages to establish each character with just a few lines or looks. The guards (known to the prisoners as “screws”) are Jim Fenner, Sylvia “Bodybag” Hollamby, Dominic McAllister, and Lorna Rose. The women of G Wing include Nikki Wade, Shell Dockley, Denny Blood, Rachel Hicks, and The Two Julies.

Jim Fenner (played by Jack Ellis, who was superb in Prime Suspect) oozes a kind of malevolent, smooth menace that makes one think of a high-school principal with a thing for 14-year-old girls. He is odious. We immediately see him swooping down on Rachel Hicks, offering her his concern and affection. This girl had got the world’s worst instincts – hasn’t she seen even one teen horror movie? She’s more vulnerable and clueless than an albino rabbit in a room full of make-up testers.

We meet Nikki Wade, wearing more lipstick than the entire cast of the L Word, but also sporting a killer red, tailored shirt. If I’d been the judge, I would have convicted her for sure – that shirt is far from innocent. It’s also faintly ridiculous in context, but hey – now we know that Nikki is our Byronic hero. Filled with noble concern for the welfare of the prisoners, she confronts Hollamby, a cynical, burned-out, ill-tempered guard, about Carol, whom we suspect may be the screaming woman in the cell. Hollamby, tells Nikki to butt out, and she retorts, “You’d gas us all in our cells, wouldn’t you.” We get the feeling Hollamby might, if only she didn’t have to clean up the mess afterwards. The women call her “Bodybag,” which is a great description of her face and demeanor.

At lockdown Carol asks Bodybag for a doctor – we see that she’s bleeding. Hollamby callously refuses, accusing Carol of merely trying to get attention, or maybe sanitary pads, and locks down the wing for the night. We see that Carol begins to bleed profusely as though she were having a miscarriage.

It’s the next morning. We see a lovely young woman dressed in a dark suit over a red shirt (hmm – whose shirt does that remind me of? Is there some sort of – oh, I don’t know, connection being made here?), driving to work, obviously late, as she’s trying to apply her mascara at a stoplight.

Cut to the guards unlocking the cells for morning. Hollamby finds Carol unconscious in her cell, covered in blood.

The young woman in the suit arrives at Larkhall Prison, and after a strange look from a security guard, she sees that she’s rather comically misapplied her mascara. These quick scenes show us she’s a woman who has not quite got her act together; she’s pressured, and her masque is slipping a bit.

She’s the Wing Governor, Helen Stewart, who want to be called “Helen,” as she says to Fenner, who insolently calls her “ma’am.” “Please, I’m not the bloody queen, Jim,” she retorts. In an absolutely lovely Scottish burr that completely disarms me, I might add, but not Fenner, I suspect.

Fenner convinces Stewart to put Rachel on “enhanced” wing, where she’ll have her own room and more privileges. “She’s got victim written all over her, ” Fenner reasons. And yes, you might as well have tattooed it right on her ass, Fenner. Stewart doesn’t realize putting Rachel on enhanced is like staking her up alone in a room with a wolf.

Breakfast time. We see Carol being taken away by EMTs. The entire third tier is clumsily held in their cells while Hollamby orders the Julies clean up the blood. The women are yelling, demanding to know what’s happened. Nikki becomes increasingly concerned, and demands a guard tell her of Carol’s condition. Nikki is tough, unafraid, a natural leader. If they played women’s flag football in England, she would be the quarterback. Which they don’t. But I can’t make a soccer, or god help me, cricket, analogy that works. Just trust me, Nikki puts the bits in Alpha on G Wing.

Governor Stewart confronts Fenner and Hollamby in her office, but doesn’t seem to be buying their story that Carol didn’t ask for medical attention at lockdown. She tells them she’s decided have a meeting with the entire G Wing. Fenner thinks that’s a terrible idea – the women are too angry. Stewart replies, “We need to be seen to care right now.”

Hollamby and Fenner leave the office, and immediately start bitching about her – “typical graduate type,” and “a bit too much of the prisoners’ friend.” Battle lines are, as they say, drawn.

Fenner checks in on Rachel, who reveals to him her boyfriend is dead from an overdose. He silkily tells her, “From now on, I’m going to keep a very special eye on you, and that’s a promise.” OK Rachel, there’s naïve, and then there’s 19 going on 6. I can’t tell if her problem is that she’s been bubble-wrapped her entire life before getting busted for drugs, or if she ought to be bubble-wrapped until she’s, say, 60 or so. I vote for the second – she’s pissing me off.

The Two Julies are talking with Nikki on the wing. Both are middle-aged blondes, one short, and the other tall. They finish each other’s sentences and frequently talk in chorus. They’ve got comic relief written all over them. Julie S is wearing a “Hello Kitty” t-shirt - an inspired wardrobe choice. They are obviously concerned when they tell Nikki they heard Carol ask Bodybag for a doctor. Nikki vows to “take it to the top” if Hollamby is not held to account, and the two Julies say (together) that they’re calling “all us kitchen women out on strike.” Solidarity of the seriously ditzy – warms the heart of the hardest union buster!

We see Stewart striding onto the Wing, her face set and tough. She’s small in stature, but the energy is rolling off her in fierce waves.

The women are gathered all around on the three levels at the center of G Wing, making a terrible racket. It’s a very aurally and visually dynamic scene, unusually so by American TV standards.

Fenner yells to everyone to settle down, and Stewart begins to address them, trying to make herself heard over their voices. She tells them Carol has suffered a miscarriage in her cell wasn’t discovered until morning unlock. She says she’s very concerned, but after conducting a “through investigation,” has concluded what occurred was “a tragic set of circumstances,” using the exact phrase Fenner offered in her office in explanation. It’s an odd moment, and it doesn’t convince the women, or us.

Nikki Wade shouts down from an upper level, acting as spokeswoman for the prisoners. “A what? She nearly bled to death! You should all be sacked!”

Nikki comes barreling down the stairs to confront Helen on her own level. The Julies and others yell to Stewart that Hollamby knew Carol was bleeding, and did nothing. The women are getting extremely loud and restive. In my mind I’m starting to shout Riot! Riot! Riot!

But Fenner quiets them down again, as Stewart starts to explain that it was an accident. Nikki interrupts with an angry, impassioned speech about how none of the women are safe on G Wing, that they aren’t believed when it’s their word again a guard’s. Nikki points in Hollamby’s direction and says it was no accident - “that cow” let it happen.

Now the Greek chorus in my mind is shouting Moo! Moo! Moo! Good thing I’m not on G Wing – I’d be in segregation most of the time, I fear.

Nikki and Helen are starring at one another with ferocious intensity. Nikki tells Helen that if the women don’t get “respect from your screws,” they won’t help her by making her “look good in front of her VIP visitors,” to the fashion show. Nikki, getting really wound up, one-ups herself with “And you can shove your stupid fashion show up your arse!” The Greek chorus women erupt in cheers.

Helen approaches Nikki, stepping directly into her personal space. “Fine, consider it cancelled. This wing won’t be taking part.” Never taking her eyes off Nikki, jabbing a finger into her face, she barks, “You’re on a Rule 43.” We have no idea what Rule 43 might be, but Helen’s eyes are so angry and electrified, that we suspect it may include beheading.

Please, someone, I need a cigarette! There are some rocket fuels with less combustible chemistry than these two. On second thought, a “no smoking” policy around them is probably safest.

Fenner tells Stewart she’s making a mistake. “One thing you better learn about me, Jim, is that once I make a decision, I stick to it.” Wait a minute, I thought Nikki was the butch here? Stewart’s jaw is tougher than Washington’s on Mt. Rushmore.

Fenner insists that the women will become even angrier if she cancels the show. Helen is furious. “Do you think I believed all that shit from Sylvia? I had to face a near riot out there because of what she let happen, so don’t blame me for coming down heavy.” Great toss down there, Helen. Did they teach you this in management grad school?

The entire wing is being put on lockdown. Fenner locks up Shell Dockley, who is fuming that she’s “worked for weeks on her cosi,” and now can’t wear it. She threatens him that he’d better fix things “or else.” Ah so! Something is up between these two, and it’s clearly Shell that’s got Fenner in some sort of lockup.

We see what Rule 43 entails. Two guards are dragging a resisting Nikki to solitary confinement – “segregation.” Hollamby sneers “put her in strips, that will give her something to moan about.” When Nikki yells, “you vicious old bitch, I’ll…” she takes a hard one in the gut from one of the guards. Ooofff. I felt that.

Helen’s office. There’s a picture on the wall of a dove being cradled in nested hands. Ha! I love art with a subtle message. Helen receives a phone call in her office. It’s the “Number One.” “Can you pop up for 5 minutes, need to have a talk with you about the fashion show,” says a bureaucratic older man with posh accent. Helen, wearing an anxious expression, says she’s on her way. Oops. In trouble with the big daddy. We see “Number One,” Larkhall’s Governing Governor Simon Stebberfield, on his end of the line, speaking an aside to someone in his office, “Your name won’t be mentioned.” It’s Fenner. Office politics being played as a gender wars: it’s just so easy to hate these smug, self-satisfied men. OK, so TPTB are stacking the deck here, but I don’t care. It’s believable. It’s a scene being played out in some cigar smoke-filled room near you right this moment.

Stebberfield tells Stewart G Wing can’t be absent from the fashion show – there are too many VIPs attending, and it would look bad to have an entire Wing “banged up,” whatever her resolve and reputation for making decisions. “I assure you, this is about more than your personal pride.” Helen looks like she’s been spanked, which she has.

Helen asks Hollamby to see to a returning prisoner with a “particularly difficult hygiene problem.” “Not Smelly Nelly Snape!” Hollamby exclaims. “If you could check her top and tail for parasites – we certainly don’t want an infestation, do we?” Ah, revenge is – sweet. Hollamby knows Helen didn’t buy her story, but also knows she doesn’t have the political cards to play to do much about more about it. “Yes Ma’am,” she responds, knowing Helen hates to be called “ma’am.” This is more fun than watching monster trucks play tug-of-war.

Fenner is next. “So, you thought you’d go over my head, Jim – man to man, the way the prison system loves best.” Ha! An economical put-down – at once clever and snarky – why is that just so damned attractive in a woman, Helen in particular?

Helen asks Fenner what his problem is with her, “My age, my background, the fact that I’m a woman? Tell me to my face when you’ve got a problem with me.” Fenner takes the hit and smoothly responds, “I did tell you what I thought of your decision, and I still haven’t heard you admit that you made a mistake. Maybe we could meet and discuss it over a drink sometime.” He walks out on Helen. Trumped her.

“Bastard,” she mutters. That round goes to Fenner.

Touching scene with the two Julies. Julie J is upset over Carol’s miscarriage, and missing her children. She’s in tears, Julie S comforting her:

Julie S: You promised me you’d stay hopeful. You don’t have to say “I” anymore. Why? Julie J: Because we’re the Two Julies
Julie S: And who can come between us?
Julie J: Nobody, nothing, never.

Only two women as “nutty” as the Two Julies could get away with this. I love it.

They cheer themselves up by tearing up a sheet, filling it with sweets for Nikki, and swinging out the window to the next cell.

Fenner comes in and tell them their strike plan will only cause them to loose their privileges and get put on report. He expertly takes the wind right out of their strike solidarity sails. Fenner clearly has a gift – he missed his calling as a Republican House Whip.

We see Nikki in segregation, wrapped in a blanket. Shell, delivering dinner, taunts Nikki that the fashion show will be back on, that she’ll be wearing her dress while Nikki goes naked. She leaves without giving Nikki any food, but the prisoner assisting Shell slips Nikki the bag of goodies from the Two Julies.

Helen at home, fresh from her shower, drying her hair. In walks a floppy-haired, tall man – think of a soggy, pale version of Hugh Grant. “Hiya, baby,” she says with a smile. Ewww. I hate that! Baby! In one second flat I know I’m going to hate this relationship. I can already feel my lip starting to curl.

She walks into his arms, kisses him, looks into his eyes, and says, “let’s get pissed tonight.” A romantic, that Helen. I also like that in a woman. Pulling out a bottle of Stoli, she expects Sean to join her while she moans about work, but he says he brought home some work to finish. She’s annoyed. “What’s the point of being freelance if you can’t set your own hours,” she says as she begins to laugh. It’s an odd scene – it looks as though it should have been outtake. Why the heck is she laughing – shouldn’t Sean only be that ludicrous to me? “You sulky bitch,” he teases, “you need a damn good thrashing.” “Mmmm,” she smiles. Ewww again. These two are just – wrong.

Sean rubs her feet while Helen sips on red wine. She says “Oh well, it’s only a sodding job, who cares,” envying him for his job satisfaction, lack of stress, and autonomy – working with plants, not people. She’s obviously working very hard to pretend she doesn’t care. She’s just as obviously unsuccessful at setting aside her day, despite the puppy dog lapping at her feet.

Sean tells Helen a customer of his asked him what she does for a living, and responded “How very sexy” to his answer. Has she met Myra Hindley, the customer wants to know. “You ignorant tosser, is that all you think women’s prisons are about,” Sean rather improbably describes his response. Sean, Sean, Sean, this is not about what a sensitive guy you are. Please, put her foot down, back away, and consider what it would be like to treat her like an actual grown-up woman. Sheesh.

He kisses her big toe then moves on top of her. “Fancy a shag?” “No,” she says with a smile. I am not smiling. Just put him out in the back yard where he belongs, Helen. I’m sure there’s a doghouse out there somewhere.

Next we see Fenner and Shell snogging in Fenner’s office (see, I’m really getting into this – snogging!). She says, “Wait to see what I give out when I’m in my dress.” OK, so that’s how it is. It’s all depressingly, crystal clear.

Sean and Helen arguing the car the next morning. “So you think I made a mistake also,” she baits Sean regarding the fashion show. She looks pinched and stressed – not like a woman recently pleasantly engaged in drinking and shagging. Something – perhaps lots of things – just aren’t working for Helen Stewart.

Fenner lures Rachel into making a clumsy pass at him, then showily backs away. “Just calm down” he sooths her, with a predatory look in his eye that we see and she does not. His performance his masterful; Rachel is either so dense or so congenitally damaged that it’s mostly wasted on her. He had her from hello.

[A commercial for Jane Austin’s Pride and Prejudice has just popped up: all chiseled jaws, blowing hair, fireworks. “You have bewitched me, body and soul.” Have even the English gone Disneyland now? Is there nothing sacred? Well, what can you expect from an actress named Keira Knightley.]

Nikki in her empty cell, sitting cross-legged on the floor, wrapped in a blanket. She seems as implacable as the Buddha. Helen enters, and turns back enraged to the guard, shouting, “What the hell is she doing in strips!” The poor little guard looks abashed. “Well, go get her clothes here immediately.’ I love that – it sounds like immeGEEately – so authoritative.

She closes the door behind her. “I’m sorry, that should not have happened,” she says with serious concern and sincerity. The scene is nicely shot, over Helen’s shoulder from above, looking down on a vulnerable Nikki, who seems anything but.

Nikki is unbending. “Happens all the time, didn’t you know.” “Well, it won’t in the future.” “Why, you going to let us lot out and lock up your screws instead?”

Helen approaches Nikki, and sits on the bed, very near to Nikki on the floor. “Look, I intend to make a lot of changes here, but I need your cooperation.” “Co-op-eration,” Nikki sneers. “You’re right, I can’t run things here without your help,” Helen responds in earnest.

Nikki: I don’t even know how people like you sleep at night if you believe in a system that locks up pregnant women.
Helen: Well, you’re just going to have to trust me. I don’t.

Nikki gives Helen a very searching look.

Trust? So soon? Helen is asking for a great deal. Another quality I love in a woman.

Shell is practicing her spastic dance moves in front of a very appreciative Denny, who leans her against the wall and says “I’d love to see you in that dress again, Shell.” The whole thing has a sordid feel about it, as if Shell really wanted to be in a production of Sweeny Todd, and Denny will soon be on the menu.

Nikki’s cell, where she’s finishing dressing. Helen is still alone with her, her back turned as she faces the window, giving Nikki a bit of privacy. The scene is beautifully framed, Helen in the far corner, her face bathed in light, and in the foreground, Nikki listening and intent in her corner.

Helen speaks. “It’s up to you. Either we both climb down together and make something positive out of this, or we all lose out to the old boy’s network.”

They turn to look at one another. Nikki looks unsure, and uncomfortable for the first time.

Helen’s got her cards on the table, but Nikki has no way of knowing if Helen is playing her. What will Nikki do? OK, really, is there any doubt? There’s angst, and then there’s being recruited by Helen Stewart. If Nikki resists her, then God doesn’t make little green apples. Temptations indeed.

Later, we see Nikki return with Carol to dining hall, Stewart behind them. “What she doing out of seg already,” Fenner mutters. The women are excited to see Carol again, who is looking remarkably recovered.

Nikki takes the floor in the center of the dining hall and asks for the women’s attention for an important announcement. Helen is watching her, quiet and tense, from the corner of the room. She begins to pace a little.

Nikki, hands insouciantly in her pockets, says the fashion show is back on. “Seeings as how I helped get it cancelled, I personally guaranteed to Miss Stewart,” giving Helen a quick glance, “that if they let us back in, G Wing would give it our best.” Fenner gives Helen a baleful shake of the head and cruel little smile. Match point and game goes to Stewart. “So if that’s OK with you babes, go out and strut your stuff!” The women cheer, showing their support for Nikki and relief that the standoff is over. Helen quietly slips out as Fenner mutters, “canny bitch.”

Denny to Shell, “it’ll be you they clap for tomorrow night, Shell.”

Cut to fashion show, where they are indeed clapping for Shell who is rather inelegantly strutting her stuff, tasseled bra and fringed mini shaking like a Jell-O salad. Stebberfield, sitting next to Helen, looks pleased, but Helen is remote, until she gives a ironic half-smile to the onstage antics. As Stebberfield escorts his easily-impressed VIP guests out, Helen quickly catches up to Nikki, who is returning to the wing. Nikki looks like a million bucks, again in her perfectly tailored red shirt and matching red lipstick. It’s too much for my taste, and I still hate her haircut, probably because it’s how I imagine my haircut looks on a bad hair day. But these are quibbles. Nikki is all that.

Helen, hair flying, actually skips ahead to catch Nikki, who turns around when she hears Helen say “Nikki,” in a softer, gentler tone than we’ve heard her use the entire episode, “I just wanted to say, thanks again for helping me out.” Nikki’s not having it. “Don’t think I did anything for you, Miss,” she retorts cheekily, and continues on her way. Helen looks slightly abashed.

Lockup. We hear Shell threatening little Rachel – “deep down I’ve got a great big soft spot for you … and I can’t wait to gob it in your face.” Shell, you’re so amusing, in that schoolyard bully sort of way. Maybe you could watch South Park for insult inspiration.

The camera pans to Rachel in the next cell, whose hair is being pulled aside by sinister hands, her next exposed to a vampire-like approach. You guessed it, Fenner. Dum dum dum…

The camera moves outside the prison, looking at the windows, from which we hear the women’s goodnights to one another. It’s a wonderfully ironic and obscene homage to The Waltons. The women hurl expression of love through the bars, “I bloody love you,” “Carol, you’re gorgeous;” some exchange menacing threats for the following day. Nighty-night, you bad girls, you. See you next week.

Tuesday, November 08, 2005

From the Department of Guilty Pleasures: Bad Girls


Woo hoo! I'm heading home tonight to snuggle up in front of the TV and indulge in one of my favorite new guilty pleasures: Bad Girls on BBC America.

There are tons of reasons to watch this smart, sexy, soapy show, but rather than convince you, I've decided to throw recaps at you. Look for the first tomorrow!

(I've seen the first season on DVD, so I know what a treat the rest of you are in for!)

OK, one reason to convince you: the show is written by actual lesbians - talented lesbians, at that - among them, Eileen Gallagher, the CEO Shed Productions. Here's what the NY Times says:
Shed's wildly popular shows have always had a tabloid brain and a progressive heart, and nowhere is this more obvious than in ''Bad Girls,'' which is set in a women's prison. The company's debut production (shown since 1999 on ITV in Britain, but making its BBC America debut on Nov. 8), it was created by Ms. Gallagher, Ms. Chadwick and Ms. McManus. No matter how far-fetched the plots get, the show is never exploitative, and over the years it has also featured an
extraordinary gallery of well-written female characters, including several who are gay and many who are still matter-of-factly sexual in their 40's and 50's, a casting opportunity that Ms. Chadwick said was part of the inspiration behind the company.

If that doesn't grab you, check your pulse. And after that, take a look at the review of the first season at afterellen.com - if you don't mind being spoiled, that is.

Governor Stewart, I'm ready for my lock-up now!

Dunkin Donuts Compassion


There are a many people in my neighborhood I think of as "homeless." I'm not sure where they actually go at the end of the day. Shelters? Assisted living? Subsidized housing? Many are clearly mentally ill, some are disabled, all are ill-kempt. Some will ask me for money occasionally. At least 4 of them say hello to me every day, and sometimes we exchange thoughts about the weather or my daughter. One woman, an older lesbian who is schizophrenic, will update me on the frightening, sad, fascinating movie going on inside her head.

Today one older woman asked me for money for a cup of coffee and a cigarette, while I was waiting for the bus. I was incredibly embarrassed to tell her I had no money in my pocket - which was true. But I had to say so while holding the cup coffee I had just bought with my last two dollar bills. It wasn't strictly true that I didn't have money - I could have gone to the trouble to cross the street, go to the ATM, get a $20, break it, and give her $5 for coffee. Why didn't I? I told her I would catch her next time. And I will - but still. I was holding a frigging cup of coffee.

These people are my neighbors. The live every day on the streets that I call home, in the very place where I feel I belong and am known and cared about. What is my responsibility to them?

Perhaps it wasn't one big thing that landed these people on the street. Maybe it was lots of little things that went wrong. Most of us, myself included, live on the financial edge - one major depression or car accident or lost job away from not making the rent.

Whatever went wrong, it must be that somewhere along the way someone could have intervened, but didn't. Someone must have failed them at some point, or many points. Lots of little points are cumulative. The tipping point is reached, and a life is ruined.

So that's my question: what is my responsibility? My role is tiny, perhaps even inconsequential, but it's real. These are my neighbors. I don't want to be just one more person who failed the lady who had simple request: a cup of coffee.

I found an extremely interesting article at Killing the Buddha, a site that I greatly value.

The writer, Peter Smith, wants to take part in a Zen retreat where "participants will live on the streets of New York experiencing homelessness first-hand, having to beg for money, find places to get food, shelter, to use the bathroom, etc. By bearing witness to homelessness, we begin to see our prejudices directly, to recognize our common humanness."

Smith wants to participate as a writer covering a "story," but he can't afford the fee retreat, and becomes embittered about the point of the retreat:

"My attempt to cover an educated, middle-class descent into poverty was nothing new. From Agee and Ehrenreich to hippie communards and New Left journalists, the downwardly mobile -- writers, bohemians, and postmodern Buddhists -- have never really exposed much more than personal desire, often a desire to become classless. Who needs a retreat to experience poverty? After all, the streets have always been full of the poor. It's nearly impossible to walk around without bearing witness to homelessness, class difference, and poverty.


That knowledge carries a burden of guilt, and an experience like a street retreat actually relieves it."


I think Smith is really missing the point here. Perhaps some are paying to relieve their guilt and indulge their desire for a classless society. But that's the point of any Zen retreat: to encounter and confront the constant arising of "self" that we would rather ignore or anesthetize. How else can we learn how to love our brothers and sisters who are living in such pain - to love the degradation within ourselves - without first fully receiving whatever is we are experiencing?

I still don't know what my responsibility is to my neighbors. I do know enough to know it's not about me or my guilt or my desire to see myself as responsible and compassionate. But what should I actually do?

Friday, November 04, 2005

Lakshmi Singh's Head Cold


I've been listening to Lakshmi Singh read the news all day today on NPR.

Does it sound like she has a cold to anybody else?

OK, this is weird, I know. I know! But I have this thing about the voices to which I listen regularly on the radio - I immediately notice when the vocal quality has changed from day to day, and I worry about the state of their health. Terry Gross sounds like she has a head cold today, too. Terry, you feeling OK? Need some hot lemon water?

I used to go through this watching Xena: Warrior Princess. For several shows every season poor Lucy Lawless sounded like her turbinates called in sick to work. I always worried. "Gabrielle, get your princess some Sudafed, quick," I wanted to say.


Am I the only one out there with these kinds of worries?

<--- (and wouldn't this be a nice way to get over a head cold? Oh yeah, I forgot - it ends badly (-; )

Initiatives for the Taking: G-CAPP's Doula Project


Today's progressive bright idea:

Georgia Campaign for Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention (G-CAPP)


"I remember looking into the eyes of a 14-year-old girl in a hospital in Albany, Georgia, who was in labor with her second child. I was told she lived in a shack that lacked running water and electricity. I knew intuitively that unless one could change the conditions of her life there would probably be more children to come. Even assuming there was a family planning clinic accessible to her and affordable, what would motivate this child to use these services? What future could she see for herself that would be compromised by having children so soon?" G-CAPP founder, Jane Fonda



I'm especially impressed by G-CAPP's model Doula Project:

What is a Doula? A doula is a woman from the local community, recruited and trained to provide emotional and physical support to both the teen mother and baby during pregnancy, delivery, and the weeks after birth.

  • Doulas are extensively-trained paraprofessionals whose primary function is to offer non-clinical support for both the young mother and the child.

  • Doulas counsel the pregnant teens and their families on the birthing process, breastfeeding, encouraging the mother-child relationship and child and infant development.

  • Doulas do not replace a midwife, the father, or the grandparents, but they enhance the experience of childbearing.

  • Doulas live where they work. The advantage of having a doula who is recruited from the same neighborhood is her ability to understand the spoken language, and share values, attitudes and experiences with the girls she serves.

  • Doulas impact health care. With a doula's support and knowledge of the birthing process, young women can better access prenatal care, develop a birth plan, and choose to breastfeed.

Thursday, November 03, 2005

The Death of the Democratic Party


What's gone wrong in the Democratic Party? Will we ever win another election? This whine has been aging for a while into a very vinegary vintage - but there it is, still being poured out everywhere. Here's the thing: the data suggests things are even worse than I thought.

Just ran across this stark report from Third Way: Strategy Center for Progressives:

Unrequited Love: Middle Class Voters Reject Democrats at the Ballot Box

Here are the key findings from the 2004 elections:


  • White middle income voters (who constitute three-quarters of the middle class and one-third of the entire electorate), delivered landslide margins to Republicans

  • The economic tipping point – the income level at which whites were more likely to vote Republican than Democrat – was $23,700, not far above the poverty level

  • Democrats carried low income married women by 15-points, but lost middle class married women by 15-points

"The only middle class voters that Democrats can count on are blacks, unmarried women, and those with a graduate education – roughly one-third of the middle class electorate. This group of middle class voters kept Democrats within shouting distance of Republicans in the last election. Democrats talk and legislate a great deal about issues that they believe are of concern to the middle class, such as better schools, affordable health care, and job security. This has not translated into middle class votes. Assuming these issues are truly important to middle class voters (and there is no reason to believe they are not), it could be that Democrats have a set of flawed messages that do not reach the middle class. Or, the middle class may simply believe that their schools will not be better, their health care will not be more affordable, and their jobs will not be more secure should Democrats run the Congress and control the White House. Whatever the reason, the self-described party of the middle class has a crisis with the middle class."


What the hell is the white middle class thinking? Surely this can't all be about WMD. Can anyone explain this to me? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller? Even better, can anyone tell me what the damn Democrats are thinking? Come on, you brain-trust types, where's our winning strategy when we most need one?

The Politics of Polarization

This Third Way paper identifies four myths to which Democrats have fallen prey:

  • The myth of mobilization is the belief that the key to Democratic victory is to energize the base and bring them to the polls in record numbers.


  • The myth of demography is the view that long-term, ongoing changes in the U.S. population - such as an increase in the number of Hispanic voters and female professionals - will secure a Democratic majority for decades to come.


  • The myth of language holds that the problem with the Democratic Party is not what it advocates, but rather how it speaks.


  • The myth of prescription drugs is shorthand for the theory that the Party can win national elections by avoiding cultural issues, downplaying national security, and changing the subject to domestic issues such as health care, education, and job security in the post-9/11 world

Fruitcake, Progressive Women, and Ms. January


Here's yet another thing I wish we had in America:

The Women's Institute

As Helen Mirren says in Calendar Girls, "It's not just a load of middle-aged women standing mysteriously behind fruitcakes, you know." The WI has an unrivalled reputation as a campaigner on women's issues. In its 90-year history, the achievements of its members are staggering and worthy of report. They helped facilitate women's suffrage. They pressed for the greater availability of cervical smears. They called for the recognition of rape within marriage. In 1943, they demanded equal pay for equal work; in 1973, they convinced local authorities to provide a full and free family planning service. In 1975, they were on the case of battered women, urging state provision of refuges across the country. Did I mention that the WI was instrumental in the introduction of the family allowance, and in particular that it be paid direct to the mother? Or that it was a founding member of the Fairtrade Foundation? No wonder Jane Fonda, herself no slouch in the campaigning department, recently called the Women's Institute "an awesome organisation."


Best line:

"Mrs Jenkins? Blogging? Whatever next?"

Semiotics as Conspiracy Theory

Update from deep cover:

Well, I think I've cracked the code, but not the nut.

Here's a briefing:

There are literally hundreds, perhaps thousands of these blogspot.com blogs with stereotypical names like Trinity Goodrich Blog and Brianna Clapp Diary and Christian Ashford Comments, all established in August 2005. Each post in each blog is posted three times in a similar blog. The original post always comes from a blog at spaces.msn.com/members, from the blogs of apparently real teenagers and young adults (although this is in question!).

If one has a prosaic mind, one would think this is an example of Splogging, or spam blogging.

But this is where it gets funny! Most splogs are either links spamming (containing mostly links to commercial sites, many that return a profit to their owner when clicked), or keyword enriching (to fool search engines into listing the site higher in the search results). However, these blogs doesn't seem to contain links, ads, or keywords. If there are search-optimizing keywords in there, they're subtle - almost random.

One big clue that these are splogs is their construction. A simple programming bot generating new blog accounts and poaching text for content could account for their similar form.

But what if these blogs are not splogs, but instead are posing as splogs, so as to be discounted or ignored (cue threatening music soundtrack)? Hmmm? What about that?

OK, I'll come clean. What most interests me about these blogs, besides their mysterious purpose, is how they function as texts to be interpreted. The act of reading these things and creating meaning becomes a fantastic literary Rorschach test, more fun than mostof those silly personality tests out there. I think it also shows the power of tools like cultural and literary semiotics and narratology. The games exposes some of the same basises as the Implicit Associations Test.

And given the current climate, how could we not respond to such evocative raw material as the following:


November 03
Haytham Abd El_Hamid Hamdy.
Where do I go ? What do I do ? I can't deny I still feel something And I wish you could say you feel the same You've broken the bond I gotta move on But how do I end this lonely feeling? You've gone, I'm here, alone I guess it's time to grow Haytham

July 17
well this is it
well im still single and staying in every night so that sucks but i did find out that i ship out for basic training on june 29th of 2006 which is awsome i go to Ft. Knox Kentucky for basic training and then for A I T (advanced individual training) i go to Aberdeen Proveing Grounds in Maryland i am doing Armerment repair so i get to fix all the Weapons then play with them to make sure that they work. So am know known as Private Calvin Heath Wynne or Private Wynne as my recruter calls me. well that all for know im going to go back to being bored out of my mind i will talk to you later. peace out
Pvt wynne

Wednesday, November 02, 2005

Off the Grid

Toggle Switch just sent me an interesting article from the WSJ by the incomparable Francis Fukuyama regarding the Theo Van Gogh murder in The Netherlands, modernity, identity, and Islamic radicalism (I recall reading a similar article in a recent New Yorker).

But now I know I've flipped out, because now I'm re-reading Brianna Rowley Notes, where in the last hour an ominous post in Dutch has appeared. I roughly translated it with Babel fish, and after closely parsing some of the other deeply bizarre postings, I'm just a bit freaked out (in that kind of excited, nerdy way). What if I've stumbled upon a terrorist communication network?

Here's one alarming post from Brianna about trying to board a flight:
Chicago believes in tears
After we boarded twice, and was kicked off the plane twice, I began to realize how serious the situation was. Our flight was cancelled due to air traffic, and 200 passengers on this plane needed to be re-booked. I really didn't know what the chance was that I would be able to fly to NJ tonight. So I ran back and forth among the main customer service center and all ATA gates, trying to catch a shorter line. I was wearing high-heel; my foot hurted and soon got worn-out. Have you ever imagined someone who dragged 3 bags, ran in the concourse as if s/he were in a race, BAREFOOT? Well I did it. :( Finally I was in front of an ATA representative, and she told me:"Sorry there're no more seats." "I understand there are no more seats available on this 6pm flight, but how about the 9pm flight? How about any flights to LGA? to JFK?" I got straight "no"s to all the questions I asked. "What am I supposed to do then?" I was really desprate -- I don't want to go downstairs, got my 200lb luggages and went back to Hyde park! "I don't know", so said the representative:"all I know is that there are no more seats." The guy who stood besides me was obviously worried too. He talked to the representative:"I really need to leave tonight. My whole family is travelling with me --- my wife and two kids, one is 5-year-old and the other is seven. I need four seats...." Surprisingly enough, the representative thought for a while, took his old boarding passes, and issued him 4 new ones:"it is boarding in 10 minutes. you will board first since you have kids." The guy took a quick glance at me, full of pity, and left in a hurry. The representative turned to me:"I am sorry, but we do not have more seats now." Well, I am travelling by my own, I don't have a wife, and I don't have kids, but, I have tears. One second later, I was wearing a crying face. "Calm down, QQ, calm down", I said to myself:"You are annadult!" but I heard myself begging in a crying voice:"any flight that could get me to New York tonight, please!" I got a new boarding pass.


And guess where this leads?

Isaiah Channing Comments, exact same post, dated Tuesday, September 27, 2005. When did this blogger account open? You guessed it, dear reader: August 2005.

Here's a sample of his ominous posts:

Sunday, September 25, 2005

"This site is under some heavy Construction"

I am currently a retired/student @ ISU. I was wounded while in the ARMY and I was medically
retired(sortof)and given the opportunity to get retrained--so I am going to be an Electrical Engineer. Well on the side I fix, build, manage and/or IT consult computer systems and small office networking solutions. I hope to find some time to get back here and do a little more work in the near future. I spend most of my repair consulting, getting rid of viruses. As long as there are (inexperienced users) idiots using P2P or any other spybot inclusive program--there will always be a need for me, keep them viruses coming



And another:

Wednesday, September 21, 2005

08.2005 - DC3 Renaissance Hotel
AnniePohaoRenaissanceNT$5000PohaoNT$2000Check in King SizeNon-Smoking
RoomAnnieKing Size(-Queen Size Bed-) (Fitness Center):
5:30AM11:00PMAnnieAnniePohao11 Annie...5:30AnnieAnniePohao AnnieNon-Smoking
RoomKing Size Bed() Renaissance Washington, DC Hotel 999 Ninth Street NW,
Washington DC ~Annie


His "Leaving Toots" post is an exact repost of another MSN Spaces blog site (just like the Cloud Atlas repost from the MSN site "Homewards")
Xplorer's Funtastic Adventure Center

August 14
Leaving Toots
The National Weather service has issued a mood swing watch effective until September 7 for everybody's favorite Carolyn.
It’s not that I think I'm going to end up acting like a real bitch for the next month or anything, but there is definitely an increased chance of strange behavior. Since I'll probably be going home either Saturday or Sunday, it means that I'll probably be seeing a lot of people for the last time for a while this week. I guess it's not so bad since I'll definitely have a chance to see everyone again next year, but it does make me a little sad.But to contrast with my sadness is excitement. This is the sort of thing an explorer dreams of. Though with every opportunity taken, you end up turning something else down. It's great to be going to Japan, but I already know I would still
have fun if I stayed here. It’s a little depressing to think of the good times I will miss over the next year, but if I stayed, I wouldn’t know what would happen over there. Actually, I might not get that sad when I say goodbye to people this week. It's still a while until I actually leave, so it's hard to feel like it will really be that long until I see everyone again. But then again, I might get sad. Then I might get sad when I leave Toledo, and I might get sad when I go toPennsylvania,and I will probably get sad when my parents leave Chicago, and then I'll probably get sad when I say bye to my brother. Then even though I will probably end up going to the airport by myself, I have a feeling I'll be pretty torn apart there too. But on the plane I'll probably get excited again. It’s the start of an adventure, and there's no reason to feel bad about that!
For now I will just try not to get overly excited or sad.

Alright, a little calm here. Before I start calling "terrorist" in crowded theater, I think I'll just play around with this some more and try to map this thing a bit better. Can you all tell I've seen 3 Days of the Condor 3 too many times?

"The people were resonating with the bridge"


Loveliest story in the news today:

Revealed: Why London's Millennium Bridge wobbled

"The phenomenon was that people who were walking at random, at their own favorite speed, not organized in any way spontaneously synchronized."


Terrific book to read: Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order

The beauty is in the mathematics - order out of chaos, no Führer or Duce need apply.

An Atlas of Spies: In which Weltatem lets her imagination run off the ranch

Sometimes I think I'm living in a dream. Or maybe I'm just seriously distracted.

WTF is she talking about, you ask? Dear reader, I have not lost it. Quite yet.

What has happened is that several little turbulent eddies of my reading life and thought life have just flowed together into a funny stream. I feel must share, if you will indulge.

So, on background: I'm almost finished reading David Mitchell's Cloud Atlas, which is brilliant and wonderful (blog coming on soon - achew!). Recently, I watched the BBC miniseries Cambridge Spies, which was quite soapy and over-cooked, but reminded me how much I loved the subject, so I hunted down the recent Anthony Blunt biography (first-rate and completely absorbing), and re-read Spycatcher (not nearly as good I remembered). Then, of course, there's the whole Valerie Plame Affair (and what an affair it would be!).

Here I am, today, unsuspectingly wandering in the blogosphere, when I happen upon this delightful entry at William Trelawney Notes :

Tuesday, October 18, 2005

Lolling about in Cambridge
August 3: Wednesday Quiet day today. Spent some time trying to confirm details of a long stay visa for France or Spain. None of the email addresses for Spanish consulates in Australia work, and the London consulate will only see UK nationals. Appears to be a similar situation with
French consulate, and they state that minimum processing time for a visa after an interview is 2 months!! Returned to Cambridge for a quieter day without weekend tourists. Spent a good chunk of time absorbed in David Mitchell's wondrous book Cloud Atlas, while sitting by the river. Some bargemen on the other side quizzed me loudly about Bondi's details, but he zzzzzzed through most of it. A passing black swan had a hook piercing its beak with river weed hanging off it, and a three way conversation about how to extract it triangulated between a punt of tourists, an Australian puntsman on the shore, and myself. I suggested contacting the Queen since she owns them. Rounded out the day with a kilometre of swimming laps at a Cambridge gym.


The rest of William's blog entries - although fascinating, especially on the topic of dyslexia - are written in a completely different voice.

Dear reader, my curiosity was aroused.

I googled the post, and found "William's" was the second re-posting.

The first re-posting was from Brianna Rowley Notes on September Tuesday, September 06, 2005. Her voice is eerily reminiscent of William's, and her blogging style similar. They both joined Blogger in August 2005. The content of both is equally as odd and fascinating as text:



Wednesday, August 31, 2005

The Wait

I am waiting for time to pass To help me cary on Get over the block in the road Time is too slow and I am only getting old Give me strenght to stand tall Even though everything else has fallen I need to be strong Soon things will come my way If they don't then the only thing I can say Is just to wait and let time pass agian


I believe I found the orignal post here, at "Mike and Bondi's" site, a man and his dog "rambling through Europe." The site's name? "

Homeward
is a labyrinth of skyscrapers & multi-coloured towers connected by a fantastic network of tunnels, secret passages, water chutes, lifts & railways.It is so large that parts of it are unknown to its owner.


Dear reader, the water chutes in my mind came together, babbling with the three voices not unlike the six of Cloud Atlas. I believe I may have stumbled upon an elaborate spy ring that uses the blogosphere as a drop box and posts, lists, and pictures as code.

Whoa.

If I'm still here in the morning, it means I'm probably wrong (unless I've been replaced by a double!). In which case, I think it would be a great plot for a quick novel. Maybe I'll start one now - I'd be in good company with the poor saps now tearing their hair out in the NaNoWriMo.

Anyone care to sleuth this with me some more?

"I fellowed sleep who kissed me in the brain"



Did you know that science hasn't yet been able to tell us why we sleep?

Check out this week's journal Nature, devoted to the science of sleep. This is the preeminent weekly science journal in the world, and this issue is freely available online - a rare occurrence.

Here's a bit to pique your curiosity, from Dr. Jerome Siegel:

Saying that it is desirable to be well rested and that the body seeks lost sleep with a vigour comparable to or greater than that displayed for food or sex does not answer the question of the functional role of sleep. Why do we spend one-third of our lives asleep? Why has our body evolved to press us relentlessly to make up for lost sleep? Can we separate the drive for sleep, manifested in sleepiness, from the function of sleep, as we can separate hunger from the benefits of food consumption? Why do so many species habitually sleep much more than humans, and others much less, and how do species that sleep for only short periods accomplish the functions of sleep in less time? Why does the daily sleep amount decrease from birth to maturity in all species of terrestrial mammals? And why do we have two kinds of sleep, rapid eye movement (REM) and non-REM (NREM) sleep?

I fellowed sleep who kissed me in the brain,
Let fall the tear of time; the sleeper's eye,
Shifting to light, turned on me like a moon.
So, planing-heeled, I flew along my man
And dropped on dreaming and the upward sky.

-- Dylan Thomas

Tuesday, November 01, 2005

High Noon for Roe


Alito was the judge in the famous Planned Parenthood v. Casey who argued that married women must notify their spouses before obtaining an abortion. His opinion was struck down by the Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision. Sandra Day O'Conor was the swing vote in that decision.

This is how the Big Boys want to play this game. It's High Noon time in the Senate. The irony is that both the Democrats and the Republicans want to play Gary Cooper, in the role of Husband-Protector to Grace Kelly. Who will blink first? Will the women in the Senate strap on their six-shooters and play by the same script?

Tick, tick, tick. Time is running out on Roe.

From Naral's Bush v. Choice blog:

Alito took pains to distant himself from the longstanding constitutional requirement that abortion restrictions must have exceptions when a woman's health is in jeopardy. He did so when ruling on a law that effectively banned abortion as early as the 12th week of pregnancy and lacked an exception to protect women’s health. The health exception is a fundamental tenet of Roe v. Wade, and the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments about the need for the health exception this fall. Should Alito’s vote replace that of Sandra Day O’Connor, a fundamental right will likely be lost by next summer.

Alito has argued that significant restrictions on a woman's right to choose are constitutional. In Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, Alito argued that all of the proposed law’s restrictions on a woman's right to choose – including a spousal notification provision struck down by the Third Circuit and, later, the Supreme Court – were constitutional. Alito dissented in part because he would have gone even further than the rest of the court.

Alito would uphold state laws that place significant roadblocks in the way of women seeking abortion care. Alito concurred with the majority’s opinion in Casey that concluded that “time delay, higher cost, reduced availability, and forcing the woman to receive information she has not sought,” although admittedly “potential burdens,” could not “be characterized as an undue burden.” This opinion practically ensures that he would never find any burden to be undue.

Linda Greenhouse at the New York Times:

WASHINGTON, Oct. 31 - The 1991 abortion case on which the confirmation of Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr. to the Supreme Court may hinge arrived at his Philadelphia-based federal appeals court at a moment of great ferment in the development of abortion law.

The Supreme Court's 7-to-2 majority for abortion rights, as expressed in the 1973 Roe v. Wade opinion, had eroded to the vanishing point. The center of gravity was held by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, whose position was difficult to parse and appeared to be evolving toward an uncertain destination.

The question facing Judge Alito and his colleagues on a three-judge appellate panel was the validity of a 1989 Pennsylvania law that placed various obstacles in the path of women seeking abortions.

All three judges agreed that most of the provisions were constitutional, as the Supreme Court itself eventually did. But on one important point, a requirement that a married woman notify her husband before obtaining an abortion, Judge Alito found himself at odds with his two colleagues, and ultimately with the Supreme Court's ruling, which sparked a debate on the high court that remains unresolved today.

Progressive Women's Blog Ring
Join | List | Previous | Next | Random | Previous 5 | Next 5 | Skip Previous | Skip Next